Aggression could be loosely defined as any behaviour which is supposed to harm another person whether actually or verbally. This investigation particularly evaluates the biological and learning perspective of psychology accounting for the expansion of aggression in children.
Aggression from the biological perspective is often seen as an innate behaviour which is certainly genetically passed on from the parents to their offspring or through other biological factors such as for example low levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin and selected brain structures when manipulated may bring about aggressive behaviour.
When considering the learning point of view and environmental determinants of aggression in children. The main element factors which play an important role in the development of aggression in kids are the observation of others behaviour as demonstrated by Albert Bandura (1961) as well as, the frustration aggression hypothesis which has been found to become a considerable factor in the creation of aggression.
This evaluation investigates the origins of childhood aggression and evaluates two differing perspectives getting the biological and learning perspective and collectively concludes that there are numerous factors which contribute to a child acting aggressively. Biological elements such as genetics, low levels of serotonin and the amygdale contain proven to lead to childhood aggression. In the same way, environmental determinants such as for example observation of others, press and video games are also found to cause childhood aggression.
However, an understanding and strong analysis of both the biological and learning perspective has lead to a stronger basis of understanding childhood aggression. Therefore, to totally figure out the origins of aggressive behaviour both biological and environmental elements must be considered within their limited scope (i.e. Strengths and weaknesses).
There are many ways that aggression can be defined. Relating to Berkowitz (1975) aggression is any behaviour which in turn causes intentional harm to another person. There are various forms of aggression which includes verbal, physical and mental behaviours that are apparent in some children. Studies conducted on small children suggest that aggression evolves in young children based on their biological history or their environmental context. This essay will be exploring and analyzing the biological point of view and learning point of view of psychology accounting for the development of aggression in young children. This issue is worthy of investigation since aggression has become a substantial social problem among approaching generations. It has often appealed to me to understand the basis of aggressive behaviour as I have seen this behaviour amongst most children, teenagers and also adults. It is my curiosity and eagerness to discover more about the advancement of aggression from two opposing views being the biological and learning which includes motivated me to attempt this research subject for my prolonged essay.
To start with, the biological perspective is based on the assumption that behaviour is definitely biologically determined. All psychological issues stem from a physiological background. Therefore, aggression in children predicated on the biological perspective is considered to come to be an innate behaviour. Biological factors which trigger extreme behaviour in children are inheritance, along with the neurotransmitter serotonin and selected structures in the brain which trigger intense behaviour. Various theories and case studies have been put forward to aid the hypothesis that aggression in kids is biologically determined which will be discussed in further details. (Weiten, W. 2007).
The biological perspective suggests that aggression in children is certainly inherited through the characteristics of parents. Various theories have been driven by findings from research on pets, which highlight that there surely is some genetic element to aggression. Selective breeding has been among the longest existing solutions to find the living of a phenotypic characteristic. In 1979 a Finnish psychologist Kristi Lagerspetz, took the most aggressive mice from an assembly and mated them with others, and in the same way the same requested those non extreme mice. Lagerspetz’s method was repeated over 26 generations of mice having a baby to their offspring. (Grivas.J, Carter.L pg.95). The results indicated that the final group of offspring, which the mice have been bred for aggressive tendencies showed tremendous levels of aggression; in many cases they instantly attacked other mice exclusively for being in the same cage as that mouse. On the other hand, the mice that have been non extreme didn’t show any signs of aggression, even when different mice attacked them they did not illustrate the inclination to retaliate. In criticism of this experiment, it clearly cannot be conducted with humans because it is evidently unethical. However a significant contribution of the selective breeding experiment can be its illustration of a genetic basis of aggression and how it could be approved onto the offspring. These mice possessed a practical advantage over human beings because these species reproduce a fresh generation in a very short time, which is vital as aggressive behaviour could be monitored over successive generations in a short period of time. In the same way, mice may also be placed imprisoned in the laboratory to see their behaviours unlike human beings. However there is usually some criticism of extrapolating from family pets to humans. Despite some similarity between humans and animals it can often be argued that there surely is still a big difference between humans and animals therefore, a direct link can’t be made between your mice species and kids.
On the other side, more efficient ways of demonstrating that aggression in kids is definitely a heritable behaviour is emphasised by various other research methodologies such as for example twin studies. Twin analyses recommend that aggression in children is normally a heritable trait and is definitely passed on from parents with their offspring. Twin studies are very useful because twins are produced from a single egg fertilised only by a single sperm, with regards to the research it assists in identifying the characteristics of their genes. Hence, most characteristics that the twins show occur as a probability of being portion of their genetic details which is similar; whereas whatever variations there are occurs because of this of the environment and encounters experienced by the average person. In a single study, conducted by research by Caspi (1998) data was collected from similar and non identical twins following a questionnaire asking different personal and non personal queries. The outcomes indicated that extreme behaviour was just partly inherited and the environment played an similarly contributing role. However, relating to Baron and Richardson (1994), the inclination to be aggressive is not passed on from the father and mother to the offspring; somewhat the temperament which is normally with the capacity of making someone more or less aggressive can be inherited. Therefore giving a different method of how aggressive behaviour may be genetically passed on. These two twin studies are plainly indicative off the heritability of aggressive behaviour, yet it cannot be claimed that inheritance is the only key factor which in turn causes aggressive behaviour or the inclination in small children.
Over time research in addition has consistently indicated that low degrees of the neurotransmitter serotonin as well plays a central purpose in increased levels of aggression in kids. In a study that was carried out in a laboratory at the National Institute of Mental Wellness (Bethasda MD), a positive correlation was found between the neurotransmitter serotonin and the degrees of aggression in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Serotonin and aggression in children, Vol 2, pg 95-101). In another analysis conducted by Russian experts, silver foxes were studied and it had been discovered that those foxes which had been selected for over 30 years for domestic behaviour showed no defensive reactions to human beings because they had high levels of serotonin in a variety of structures of the mind, compared to the foxes which have been bred without flexibility (Popova, Voitenko, Kulikov, Avgustinovich, 1991, pg 751). These studies plainly highlight the role which serotonin plays in leading to aggressive behaviour amidst children; the lower the degrees of serotonin the higher the level of aggression. Of lessons this research could possibly be criticised on the grounds that it is a large jump from family pets to children. Yet, the effectiveness of this experiment was these foxes could possibly be trained and kept ever an extended time frame where there behaviour is normally closely observed unlike individuals who cannot be placed in such tamed conditions.
There also certain parts of the brain which were found to be in charge of the creation of aggression in human beings particularly children. These two structures located within the brain being the hypothalamus and the amygdales were found to be in charge of intense behaviour. Both structures are made up of nerve cells and talk to one another via electric indicators. These brain structures can be manipulated using electric currents where the experimenter may either decide to switch on or pull the plug on the mind structures disabling their usual procedure using an electrode. It’s been found through numeral efforts that whenever these structures were stimulated, some animals initiate an increase in aggressive responses so when it was powered down meaning its functioning was ended aggressive responses decreased. For instance when animals such as pups and cats’ hypothalamus and amygdale had been manipulated by the electrode and their activity was blocked the family pets demonstrated no behaviour towards particular objects which generally trigger
an aggressive response. For instance a pet dog wouldn’t bark at any passing pet dog, highlighting no extreme response. However, through the normal operation of these structures these pets or animals generally bark at any passing pup. This obviously demonstrates that the manipulation of the hypothalamus and amygdale both play a role in the creation of aggression. Such methods of demonstrating the position which specific structures of the
The biological way of explaining extreme behaviour in children is quite scientific consequently regarded as reliable. It is based on many experimental research which are carried out in laboratory circumstances. However this is only not only strength but as well a potential weakness as associated with the biological perspective in explaining intense behaviour in children. The reason being is that folks particularly children will behave differently under laboratory conditions when faced with an identical situation in true to life. Thus, this will not implicate that such laboratory experiments aren’t valuable rather they are limited to the generalisabilty. However, it has been found that there’s a positive correlation between real life situations and predicted extreme behaviour in laboratory research which indicate that laboratory experiments will be fairly useful.
The biological perspective can be criticised on the foundation that aggression in children cannot be related to studies which have been conducted on pets or animals. One argument stemming out of this criticism is that it is not possible to use animal findings to humans whatever the similarities because they are different. Parallels between human beings and animals may be oversimplified and for that reason social as well as learning processes must also be taken under consideration. Interpretation of animal outcomes from the biological point of view requires cautious interpretation. On the other hand on the other hand, using animals to demonstrate the link between childhood aggression and biological elements can be very beneficial. That is due to the fact that some studies such as the breeding of generations and the localisation of the brain to identify parts which play essential roles in the development of aggression cannot be conducted on humans because it will cause psychological and physical harm to the participants and typically likely will result in death. Similarly, there is always some sort of connection and likewise between animals and human beings therefore using animals can be a starting point to understanding the biological bases of aggression in children is benfiecial.
Another weakness of explaining the production of aggression in kids from the biological point of view is since the biological approach is reductionist. This is one of the primary weaknesses that your biological perspective incorporates. It does not regard or take in to the account the interaction of your brain and body with the environment rather only takes into consideration the neurological processes. It does not have into perspective the influence of the encompassing environment. That is a downfall as complicated human behaviours cannot always be described on a genetic basis; the encompassing environment likewise plays a central function in the influencing and triggering of aggressive behaviour. For instance, it cannot be claimed that only 1 structure of the mind is in charge of the advancement of aggression in kids because all structures of the brain are connected and their impact or triggering of behaviour can’t be predicated on one structure.
The biological perspective likewise requires low ecological validity. Most research are carried out within laboratory conditions accordingly having low ecological validity. Experiments conducted in the laboratory will most definitely produce different results therefore in real life situations as participants won’t demonstrate the exact same behavior in true to life situations because they will in the laboratory.
Similarly, the findings of all studies conducted cannot be generalised to all or any children. These findings are applicable to a tiny sample and findings cannot be expected to end up being the same for a distinct sample of children as all children will vary. Yet, this can https://testmyprep.com/lesson/hints-and-tips-on-how-to-write-an-opinion-essay be a starting point to understanding the foundation of aggressive behaviour.
On the other hand the learning perspective is set up on the basis that although many people are born with a genetic endowment which may be the reason behind instinctual behaviours, the majority of behaviour is learned from the environment. Out of this basic assumption the learning perspective suggest that aggression in children will not purely develop as a result of biological factors, somewhat it accounts for an extremely minor part. Aggression is normally learnt from the observation of other people and their extreme behaviour. Aggression in children is also learnt through the observation of discouraged people who surround them and frustration as well triggers aggressive behaviour. It has additionally been discovered that violent video gaming are associated with aggressive behaviour amidst children.
Firstly, one of many theories proposed to support aggression from the training perspective is the ‘frustration-aggression hypothesis’ which was proposed by John Dallas (1930) and his partners. The frustration aggression theory suggests that frustration is the primary factor which plays a part in aggression. If in times where one is discouraged then it will immediately bring about aggressive behaviour. According to the hypothesis aggression is only going to occur due to frustration and no other particular factor. Also, the level of aggression demonstrated can be purely dependant how frustrated one may be. For instance whenever a kid is prevented from going for a course of action or being prevented from something it really is most likely believed that the kid will be intense; occurring therefore of being frustrated. For instance, whenever a child wants a plaything or a chocolate from the supermarket plus they don’t get what they want then frequently they become intense against their parents whether physically as well as verbally. Even so, this theory has got its weaknesses. Frustration won’t always lead to aggression it could often result in depression and also withdrawal. As well, aggression generally occurs consequently of many other emotions such as for example sadness, fear, nervousness etc.
Roger Barker, Tamara Dembo and Kurt Lewin (1941) further investigated frustration as a cause of aggression in small children. In their conducted study, children were proven a roomful of appealing toys which were maintained out of their reach. The children were kept from the toys some time before they were allowed to play with them. On the other hand, the controlled conditioned group of the children were permitted to quickly play testmyprep with the playthings. Similar to Dallas’s findings, it was observed out of this conducted study that the kids who were frustrated because they had to wait an extended period of time before exposure to the toys, enjoyed aggressively with the toys by smashing and stomping the gadgets. Alternatively, the kids who were permitted to play promptly with the gadgets handled them thoroughly and played happily.
One social determinant of aggressive behaviour can be Albert Bandura’s public learning theory (1961) which highlights the function of observation and its own consequences on the aggressive behaviour of kids from the learning perspective. Albert Bandura believes that most of human behaviour is discovered by observing a style or just another person, which influences a child’s view of how this fresh behaviour could be developed and finally believing that this different attained behaviour is helpful information for their actions. This provides the basis of explaining aggressive behaviour in children from the training perspective. Albert Bandura’s renowned experiment was the Bobo doll experiment; bobo doll being truly a plastic material clown doll. In this experiment Albert Bandura and his colleagues, examined the consequences of children observing a grown-up behave aggressively with a bobo doll. During the experiment he had children watching model performing aggressively towards a bobo doll. They viewed the video of the model frequently acting aggressively in ways of sitting down on the doll, punching it and kicking it repeatedly. He likewise had other children watch a non aggressive model playing calmly with the bobo doll. After the children were exposed to such models, these were taken into another space where there were many toys between them the bobo doll. The results from this indicated that kids, who were subjected to the aggressive unit and observed their acts, imitated aggressive behaviour towards the bobo doll. Whereas, the kids who were subjected to the non aggressive style showed no or very little aggressive behaviour.
Albert Bandura’s Bobo Doll was suited to highlight the purpose of observation in children’s learning. Children were the subject as they are significantly less socially conditioned unlike individuals. Even so, this experiment raises the likelihood that children may have thought that experiment was a game because of the bobo doll having a springtime which springs back soon after being knocked straight down. A criticism of the research is that it’s not ecological. Thus the kids may have certainly not acted aggressively towards any human being in true to life.
A criticism of the public learning theory can be that this theory will not take into account the changes which a child undertakes including physical and mental as a child matures. Children at distinct ages may respond to laboratory experiments in different ways.
Much like observation of other’s behaviours violent video gaming and television shows are also proved to a certain
extent to bring about aggression in children. The learning perspective suggests that children who play violent video games very often such as for example Doom, Wolfenstein 3D or Mortal Fight and others could bring about aggressive behaviour, either actually or verbally. Violent video games have a supplementary effect on young children and trigger aggressive behaviour a lot more than violent television shows because they’re more interactive where the child is engaged in such extreme acts and in the end they are rewarded for performing aggressively in the game. Dr. Craig A good. Anderson, Ph.D. (2000), of Iowa State University in Ames and his colleagues discovered that in the U.S and Japan that Japanese and American kids who played violent video gaming demonstrated more intense behaviour months later in comparison to their peers who didn’t. In this review, 181 Japanese college students aged between 12 and 15 years aged and 364 U.S. children aged between 9 and12 years previous were analyzed. The U.S children named their favourite video games and how often they performed them. Whereas with japan children, these were observed to observe how quite often they played violent video games. The children were down the road asked to price their degree of aggression and reports from their teachers and peers had been also taken into account. From the results it was found that the children who were exposed to more violent video games were much more aggressive than those who were less exposed. This is particularly demonstrated whenever a comparison was made between their prior levels of aggression (at the start of the study) and how there is a dramatic go up in this level. (Cited in BBC News, Video gaming ‘increase aggression, Wellness Section). Violent video gaming can impact on children’s aggression levels, this is due to the fact the children start to believe that the world is certainly a hostile place and aggressive acts are acceptable and so are part of a standard daily life to manage the aggressive world. Additionally it is been discovered that frequent and excessive exposure to violent video gaming causes children to be desensitized to violence. Once they have been engaged in aggressive functions it impacts on the children emotionally and as a consequence these children find it easier and acceptable to activate in violence and extreme acts.
Berkowitz. et.al (1979) investigated the effect of pain and discomfort on individuals to show their likelihood of acting aggressively. He induced pain by positioning the participant’s hands in frigid or warm water while they distributed benefits and punishments to a partner. Berkowitz identified that those who had their hands placed in the cold water caused greater home with their partner then those who experienced their hands immersed in hot water.
The learning perspective also incorporates strengths and weaknesses. Like the biological perspective of make clear aggressive behaviour in kids, it is reductionist. It explains aggressive behaviour regarding a characteristic which is being learnt although it will not deny/ or reject the genetic endowment of intense behaviour it argues that extreme behaviour is learn through observation and triggered by the surrounding environment and conditions. It simplifies the occurrence of particular behaviours especially aggression into a few steps. For instance the condition of reduction is evident in Albert Bandura’s study of the bobo doll whereby extreme behaviour is decreased to the procedure of imitation. So, it has overlooked various other leading causes of the expansion of aggression including the children’s upbringing and home environment. Children were varied consequently some children may have been raised in a violent residence and exposed to many aggressive situations, accordingly this may have affected just how they acted in the laboratory and the best effects of the experiment.
The Frustration aggression hypothesis supported by Dallas (1931) is not a very efficient method of demonstrating how childhood aggression evolves as in some cases, such as learned helplessness, frustration may well not result in aggression instead may cause depression; therefore frustration is not the only main factor which contributes to aggressive behaviour there are additional sources which may cause aggressive behaviour.
The learning perspective also denies some very crucial mental processes which also result in the expansion of aggression in kids. It does not consider how certain brain structures may trigger intense behaviour, quite simply it does not take into account neurological processes rather basically accounts for the influences of daily lives and the environmental context which one is brought up in. It generally does not include any biological or cognitive processes which are also in charge of the creation of aggression.
Nevertheless, the learning perspective focuses on the surroundings and the condition when a child is conditioned to produce an extreme response. It has many practical applications which were effective in explaining the expansion of intense behaviour. It plainly highlights how specific behaviours particularly aggression could be learned by the observation of others.
The learning perspective also offers a low ecological validity, whereby the children who were engaging in the experiment may have acted in a different way in the laboratory in that case what they might have in a real life condition. To be specific, Albert Bandura’s bobo doll experiment can be criticised on the grounds that the children’s aggression was measured from their natural environment. However if such experiments are conducted in a far more realistic manner then the results will be more beneficial with regards to understanding how aggressive behaviour in children develops.
Having deemed the interpretations of the production of aggression in kids from both biological and learning point of view and the criticisms which arise from the study conducted, it usually is concluded that both biological and learning point of view contribute to the development of aggression in children. In terms of the biological point of view, this talks about aggression as purely predicated on biological bases. It really is highly reliable since is founded on science. Nevertheless the learning perspective, views aggression mainly because unrelated to genes rather being learnt. The training perspective’s interpersonal learning theory is an extremely useful explanation for the extreme behaviour of kids. It not only applies to direct experiences such as being disciplined by parents but instead at all times such as for example when watching television. Whereas the frustration-aggression hypothesis includes a weaker stand, this is due to frustration does not always educe aggression somewhat it may inspire retaliation. The hypothesis shows that frustration makes up about all aggressive acts for this reason it is not totally justified, because there are more determinants of aggressive behaviour. Both the biological perspective and learning perspective derive from a lot of support and analyses which were conducted. However, the training perspective opinions aggression in children as having some sort of biological basis, however through encounter and reinforcement that aggression turns into evident amongst children. For instance, the role of the mother or father is paramount in applying the biological elements of the child to mould the child and guide them through their advancement. If a child’s genes happen to be intense, the parent within the environment will try to nurture and accommodate because of their child’s genes by attempting to supply a calm background. Father and mother could also choose to put their child in a career that is sports oriented to appeal to the aggressive levels so as to use their strength in a positive approach. Out of this it is evidently evident that both the biological point of view and learning perspective take into account and contribute to the development of aggression in kids.
Both the learning perspective and biological contribute similarly to the expansion of aggression in children as it is hard to isolate the contributing elements. It is clear that biological elements as well as the surrounding environment both play a substantial role in the production of intense behaviour in children.
Bandura, A good. And Ross, D. and Ross, S.A (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive designs, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582
Baron. R, Richardson. D , 2005, Human being Aggression, Second Edition, Plenum Publishing
Barker, R.Dembo, T., and Lewin K. (1941). Frustration and aggression: An test out young children, University of Iowa Analyses in Child Welfare, 18, 1-314.
BBC News, Video gaming ‘increase aggression, health Section, Sunday, 23 April, 2000, accessed 5th July 2009 available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/720707.stm
Berkowitz, L. (1975). A survey of Sociable Psychology. Hillsdale, IL: Dryden Press
Caspi, R. Plomin, R., Corley, A., Fulker, D.W., & DeFries, J.C. (1998). Adoption results for self-reported individuality: Journal of Individuality and Social Psychology, 75, 211-218
Effie M.Mitsis, Jeffrey M. Halperin and Jeffrey H. Newcorn,2000, Serotonin and aggression in children, Current Psychiatry Reviews Journal, Volume 2, #2 2, (1535- 1645).
Glassman, William.E, (1947), Methods to Psychology- 2nd edition
Harding Anne, CNN, Violent video gaming linked to child aggression, 2009 accessed on the 18th July, 2008 from http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/family/11/03/healthmag.violent.video.kids/inde x.html
Popova N, Voitenko N, Kulikov A good, Avgustinovich D. Facts for the involvement of central serotonin in mechanism of domestication of silver foxes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991; 40:751-756
Russell G. Geen (Editor), Edward I. Donnerstein, August 1998, Human Aggression: Theories, Study, And Implications For Social Policy also available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/f713000110546w0h/
Tremblay Richard, Willard W, Archer John, 2005, Developmental origins of aggression
Weiten, W. (2007). Psychology: Themes and variations. (7th Edition).